<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Indie Film Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theindiefilmblog.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theindiefilmblog.com</link>
	<description>Indie Filmmaking Tips, Tricks, and Insights from Andrew Seltz - The Go-To Guy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:16:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Downloads for Your Video Productions by Obviouschildblog</title>
		<link>http://www.theindiefilmblog.com/news/free-downloads-for-your-video-productions.html/comment-page-1#comment-12274</link>
		<dc:creator>Obviouschildblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.incorrigibleproductions.com/blogs/indiefilm/2006/07/12/free-downloads-for-your-video-productions/#comment-12274</guid>
		<description>simply awesome; not sure if I&#039;d ever use them, but sometimes it&#039;d be nice to throw a &#039;rating&#039; up before a trailer, just to add that extra little bit of production value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>simply awesome; not sure if I&#8217;d ever use them, but sometimes it&#8217;d be nice to throw a &#8216;rating&#8217; up before a trailer, just to add that extra little bit of production value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shooting Advice: Slate Every Take Or Regret It Later by Obviouschildblog</title>
		<link>http://www.theindiefilmblog.com/digital-production/shooting-advice-slate-every-take-or-regret-it-later.html/comment-page-1#comment-12273</link>
		<dc:creator>Obviouschildblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.incorrigibleproductions.com/blogs/indiefilm/2006/07/25/shooting-advice-slate-every-take-or-regret-it-later/#comment-12273</guid>
		<description>I agree and disagree; with the advent of software like Pluraleyes, using a clapboard is sometimes not necessary depending on the length of the production.  Sometimes it can even be a hindrance to what you are tying to do.  I do agree that slating can be very helpful, but what I&#039;ve started to do, since everything is stored on SD card now, is that I rename my files as I go.  Or I just delete them if I know they will be of no use.   This is something that you really couldn&#039;t do with MiniDV, (at least didn&#039;t want to take the time to do).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree and disagree; with the advent of software like Pluraleyes, using a clapboard is sometimes not necessary depending on the length of the production.  Sometimes it can even be a hindrance to what you are tying to do.  I do agree that slating can be very helpful, but what I&#8217;ve started to do, since everything is stored on SD card now, is that I rename my files as I go.  Or I just delete them if I know they will be of no use.   This is something that you really couldn&#8217;t do with MiniDV, (at least didn&#8217;t want to take the time to do).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Make Your Video Look Like Film by Obviouschildblog</title>
		<link>http://www.theindiefilmblog.com/lighting/make-your-video-look-like-film.html/comment-page-1#comment-12271</link>
		<dc:creator>Obviouschildblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.incorrigibleproductions.com/blogs/indiefilm/2006/08/13/make-your-video-look-like-film/#comment-12271</guid>
		<description>I agree with pretty much the entire post; Another tip I would add is to constantly white balance using some kind of white balance card.  Also, vary your shots.  Get a flow, wide shot to establish, medium, and then over the shoulder, and at least try to get one close up for each scene.  Having the variation of shots goes a long way.  But, by far the most important I would say is how you move the camera.  Don&#039;t zoom, use a dolly, use a jib or a glidecam.  If you don&#039;t have any of those things, just use a tripod.  Whatever you do; believe me, you cannot get the Cloverfield look by shooting handheld w/ no production value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with pretty much the entire post; Another tip I would add is to constantly white balance using some kind of white balance card.  Also, vary your shots.  Get a flow, wide shot to establish, medium, and then over the shoulder, and at least try to get one close up for each scene.  Having the variation of shots goes a long way.  But, by far the most important I would say is how you move the camera.  Don&#8217;t zoom, use a dolly, use a jib or a glidecam.  If you don&#8217;t have any of those things, just use a tripod.  Whatever you do; believe me, you cannot get the Cloverfield look by shooting handheld w/ no production value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review: Hands-On Experience With The Panasonic AG-HVX200 by Obviouschildblog</title>
		<link>http://www.theindiefilmblog.com/cameras/review-hands-on-experience-with-the-panasonic-ag-hvx200.html/comment-page-1#comment-12270</link>
		<dc:creator>Obviouschildblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.incorrigibleproductions.com/blogs/indiefilm/2008/03/03/review-hands-on-experience-with-the-panasonic-ag-hvx200/#comment-12270</guid>
		<description>I dig; I was really close to getting the HVX to replace my DVX-100b (which I still have and use for wedding work).  However, I went by way of Canon SLR for the low light performance and lens interchangeability.  Needless to say, there are some features you mentioned on the HVX that I certainly wish I had.  Cheers,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dig; I was really close to getting the HVX to replace my DVX-100b (which I still have and use for wedding work).  However, I went by way of Canon SLR for the low light performance and lens interchangeability.  Needless to say, there are some features you mentioned on the HVX that I certainly wish I had.  Cheers,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Film And Video Frame Rates by Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.theindiefilmblog.com/news/film-and-video-frame-rates.html/comment-page-1#comment-12269</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.incorrigibleproductions.com/blogs/indiefilm/2006/08/17/film-and-video-frame-rates/#comment-12269</guid>
		<description>Good post; I&#039;m still angry that CANON SLR&#039;s are bring some strange frame rates; all their SLR&#039;s should be able to shoot 24 fps, not just 30, and clearly if you can shoot 30, you have the equipment to shoot 24.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post; I&#8217;m still angry that CANON SLR&#8217;s are bring some strange frame rates; all their SLR&#8217;s should be able to shoot 24 fps, not just 30, and clearly if you can shoot 30, you have the equipment to shoot 24.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
